Enhancing Genealogical Communication: Insights from Channel Expansion Theory
The realm of genealogy, delving into the intricate tapestry of family histories, is not merely a pursuit of names and dates but a vibrant narrative woven through generations. Communication forms the crux of unraveling these stories, yet a recent study exploring the application of the channel expansion theory sheds light on intriguing dynamics that extend beyond traditional paradigms.
Channel Expansion Theory: A New Perspective
The study sought to scrutinize the channel expansion theory, challenging the conventional wisdom proposed by Daft and Lengel (1984) regarding media richness and communication preferences. It demonstrated that individuals’ channel preferences are not solely influenced by inherent richness but are significantly shaped by social perceptions. Participants’ responses varied distinctly when asked about their preferred communication channels versus those perceived as preferred by their families. This variance highlights how messages can alter the ideal channel based on societal norms — a revelation strengthening the channel expansion theory.
Genealogists’ Communication Predicament
Despite genealogists’ prowess in researching family histories, a glaring concern emerges: their proficiency in communication falls short. Martin, Hagestad, and Diedrick (1988) note that family stories often dissipate after a generation or two, indicating a lapse in communication. Interestingly, genealogists’ preferred channels align with those adopted by businesses, underscoring their professional approach. However, initiating discussions about genealogy within families seems to present significant challenges.
Insights into Younger Adults’ Engagement
The study’s insights into adults aged 18 to 30 raise critical concerns. Not only were responses limited, but participation in genealogical discussions appeared infrequent among this demographic. This observation prompts a deeper exploration to discern underlying reasons and devise strategies to address this communication gap.
Implications and Future Directions
Analyzing communication theories underscores the significance of comprehending media richness in channel selection for genealogical discourse. While genealogists lean towards professional channels akin to business communication, it may not align with familial preferences. This disparity emphasizes the need for further exploration into participant experiences and intentions.
The study’s limitations, particularly the age gap’s impact, are evident. Younger adults’ disinterest in family history discussions poses challenges in identity formation, as highlighted by Fivush et al. (2008). Bridging this gap necessitates understanding perceptions of channel richness among younger demographics, allowing genealogists to tailor their approach.
In the burgeoning field of genealogy, this research serves as a beacon, guiding practitioners in effective communication strategies, not only within families but also facilitating organizations’ engagement with novice genealogists. The evolving landscape demands an agile approach — organizations must adapt to genealogists’ evolving channel preferences. Future research should delve into evolving perceptions of new channels, experiences, and intentions to refine communication strategies.
As the genealogy domain continues to expand (Darby & Clough, 2013), this study’s insights offer a compass, steering genealogists towards more effective communication channels, bridging the gap between personal heritage and contemporary communication norms.
For more in-depth reading, please check out my class research paper on LinkedIn. Still learning how to write research papers but does give more details that what was written here.